Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris frost
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:11, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Chris frost (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
NN entrepreneur. A Google search does not confirm the article's claims of importance. Does not meet WP:BIO and WP:RS standards. Pastor Theo (talk) 12:16, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: non-notable. Jofakēt (talk) 14:31, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete cannot find any references giving any detail of coverage to this person, hence not notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. Hut 8.5 15:57, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Congratulations to what seems to be a very successful entrepreneur, but he fails WP:BIO, and his businesses fail WP:CORP. Success does not equal notability. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 18:16, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for non-notability. Drmies (talk) 19:29, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:BIO. Schuym1 (talk) 00:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.