Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 June 17
June 17
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- File:Baba Hari Dass.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This image is on websites at higher resolution (here and [www.http://saltspringcentre.com/about/baba-hari-dass/ here]). We probably need a higher resolution upload to demonstrate the sourcing is correct. Peripitus (Talk) 05:24, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- Though the tune may be old, this edition of it is under copyright. A newly typeset version of a public-domain tune should be used instead. —Jchthys 12:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- File:Aim image 01sla.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The webpage cited in the permission section states: "Copyright © 2006 Sri Lanka Army | All Rights Reserved
Contents of this site are the sole property of Sri Lanka Army and any duplication in any media is liable for prosecution.Reproduction of these465 stories/data is possible provided its source is given its recognition." so it's pretty clear the content is not freely licensed. —innotata 13:25, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- Linked permission is for Wikipedia only. January (talk) 21:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Insufficient release as free image. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:37, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Don't delete the file, just change the licensing to fit the permission granted.Divine618 (talk) 02:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- The image would need to be released by the copyright holder under a licence which freely allows commercial use and modification, permission for Wikipedia use only is not sufficient (please see [1] for background/explanation, particularly the sixth paragraph). January (talk) 12:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- Linked permission is for Wikipedia only. January (talk) 21:21, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Insufficient release as free image. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:36, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Don't delete the file, just change the licensing to fit the permission granted.Divine618 (talk) 02:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- Please see response in the discussion above. January (talk) 12:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- If she gave me permission to use the photo, then why is there a need to delete it? I understand that it's not a complete free image but can't it still be used on Wikipedia? Divine618 (talk) 21:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- No, it would fail WP:NFCC#1 as a non-free image since the subject is a living person and it is possible to create a free image of him, so unless the copyright holder releases this image under a free licence it will have to be deleted. January (talk) 06:59, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
- Okay I am going to see if the author wants to release the image under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license. Divine618 (talk) 22:55, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- "Photographer sold the photo" does not transfer the copyright, unless there is a signed release to go with it. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- File:Patrick Durham.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See "File:Patrick Durham Model June 2006 .PNG" above, same image Ronhjones (Talk) 23:25, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.