Back to AmatoresAnime's Profile AmatoresAnime's Profile

**Through the years, this work has been repeatedly venerated as a masterpiece, its status seemingly unassailable.**

Yojouhan Shinwa Taikei (The Tatami Galaxy), an adaptation of Tomihiko Morimi’s novel by the inimitable Masaaki Yuasa, is less a conventional narrative and more a fevered meditation on the labyrinthine nature of choice, regret, and the illusory pursuit of an idealized existence. Within its kaleidoscopic structure, time does not adhere to the rigid linearity of cause and effect but instead loops back upon itself in an endless recursion—a purgatorial reel of youthful disillusionment where every path, no matter how meticulously selected, inexorably leads to some permutation of disappointment.

*Disclaimer: This is ... an earnest reflection, written with complete honesty and the true depth of my feelings.

Beneath its frenetic dialogue and riotous animation, the series harbors a philosophical inquiry of disquieting profundity: If every decision yields a different reality, each imbued with its own brand of dissatisfaction, does the notion of a "correct" choice hold any meaning at all? The nameless protagonist—adrift in a world of infinite possibilities—seeks the elusive rose-colored campus life, believing that the optimal trajectory is but one impeccable decision away. Yet each attempt to engineer a utopian existence culminates in stagnation, disillusionment, and an ever-intensifying awareness of life’s Sisyphean cruelty.

The Tatami Galaxy operates in the liminal space between absurdity and poignancy, a realm where the grotesque humor of human folly gives way to the stark realization that the relentless pursuit of an unattainable ideal precludes one from engaging with the present. The labyrinthine tatami rooms that stretch into eternity become not just a visual motif, but a symbol of the protagonist’s self-imposed exile—a prison of his own making, woven from the threads of indecision and nostalgic longing.

Yet, as the series unfolds towards its inevitable, the suffocating rigidity of determinism begins to fracture. The past is not a chain binding one to despair, nor is the future an ever-receding horizon of lost possibilities. Instead, meaning emerges in the simple act of inhabiting the now—of grasping, however belatedly, that fulfillment does not reside in the meticulous curation of experience but in the raw, imperfect, and unrepeatable immediacy of lived reality.


The Tatami Galaxy is, at first glance, a whimsical odyssey of youthful misdirection, a feverish recounting of an unnamed protagonist’s ceaseless pursuit of an idealized university life—yet beneath its frenetic narration and kaleidoscopic visual landscape lies a far more profound meditation on regret, determinism, and the illusory nature of choice. It is not merely a coming-of-age tale, but rather a metaphysical parable on the futility of seeking a singular, optimal path through life, a path unblemished by disappointment or self-reproach.

At its core, the series deftly dismantles the protagonist’s foundational assumption: that happiness is an equation to be solved, a prize awaiting those who make the “right” decisions. He believes, with unwavering conviction, that had he simply chosen the correct club, befriended the right people, or seized an ephemeral opportunity, his existence would have seamlessly unfolded into the fabled rose-colored campus life he so desperately covets. Yet, as the narrative unfurls in its recursive structure—each loop a distorted reflection of the last—it becomes painfully evident that no permutation of choices will ever yield the utopia he envisions. The illusion of a perfect reality, perpetually out of reach, is his prison, and the more he chases it, the tighter the walls of his self-imposed confinement close in around him.

This, perhaps, is where The Tatami Galaxy achieves its most poignant revelation: regret is not merely the residue of poor decisions but an inescapable condition of human existence. To live is to be haunted by the ghosts of unrealized possibilities, by the infinite permutations of a life not lived. The ever-constricting tatami room—its walls encroaching upon the protagonist until he is left with only the suffocating weight of his own indecision—is a manifestation of his psychological entrapment, his refusal to embrace the irrevocability of the present moment.

Yet, for all its existential musings, The Tatami Galaxy does not succumb to despair. If Neon Genesis Evangelion subjects its audience to an unrelenting excavation of trauma, and if Serial Experiments Lain dissolves the very boundaries of perception and reality, then The Tatami Galaxy stands apart as something altogether different: a wry, philosophical acknowledgment that life is neither a grand puzzle to be solved nor a script to be revised, but rather an ever-unfolding narrative, defined not by its hypothetical alternatives but by the imperfect beauty of its lived experience. Rather than imprisoning oneself in the infinitude of what-ifs, the series suggests, perhaps the only way forward is to simply open the door.


If The Tatami Galaxy were truly themasterpiece its admirers claim, it would dare to descend into the abyss, to wrestle with the unfathomable despair that lingers beneath its mind-chaos. But instead, it remains suspended in a purgatorial loop of self-aware indulgence, far more enamored with the aesthetics of philosophical inquiry than with the harrowing process of actually engaging with it. It is, in this sense, the Run Lola Run of anime—a film that, for all its temporal experimentation, ultimately resolves itself into something facile, a puzzle box that snaps shut without ever threatening to upend the comfortable reality of its audience. Unlike Synecdoche, New York, which unspools the infinite regress of the self until nothing remains but decay and futility, The Tatami Galaxy pulls its punches, ensuring that every detour through the labyrinth leads, inevitably, to a neatly assembled moral lesson.

This is where it falters most grievously. Consider the works of Kierkegaard, whose Either/Or lays bare the crushing weight of choice, or Nietzsche’s concept of eternal recurrence, in which one must confront the horror of living the same life again and again, not as a hypothetical but as a test of one's will to affirm existence. Were The Tatami Galaxy to take these ideas seriously, it would not permit its protagonist a redemptive epiphany as convenient as "embracing the present." True existentialism does not offer such absolution. The unexamined life is not rectified by mere recognition of its patterns but by the agonizing, irreversible act of breaking them.

One cannot help but juxtapose this series against The Holy Mountain, where Alejandro Jodorowsky deconstructs identity, power, and the pursuit of meaning until all that remains is an empty frame—an acknowledgment that narrative itself is an illusion. Yuasa, by contrast, is unwilling to strip his artifice down to its bones; he stops just short of dismantling his protagonist’s ego, allowing him instead to settle into a conclusion that reassures rather than devastates. It is as if The Tatami Galaxy wishes to be seen as profound without enduring the sacrifice necessary to be profound.

Compare this, too, with Bergman’s The Seventh Seal, where Death is not merely a metaphor or a narrative device but an unrelenting presence, a specter that refuses to be ignored. When Antonius Block plays chess with Death, it is not a game with multiple resets, nor is it a whimsical trial meant to nudge him toward a sentimental realization about life’s beauty. It is final, merciless, unyielding. In The Tatami Galaxy, however, consequences are soft, cushioned by the playful elasticity of its structure. This is not an honest depiction of existential despair—it is a gamified facsimile, an amusement park ride through the anxieties of youth that ultimately deposits its passengers safely back where they started, now equipped with a conveniently digestible moral.

If anything, The Tatami Galaxy is a testament to the ways in which modern storytelling often dilutes existentialism into a palatable aesthetic rather than a genuine confrontation. It dances around the void but never plunges into it, perpetually circling the perimeter of something greater, more terrifying, and more real. If true profundity is measured by the wounds it leaves, the scars it etches into the viewer’s psyche, then The Tatami Galaxy is little more than a clever distraction, a work that gestures at the nature of eternity while remaining comfortably ensconced in the ephemeral.


The Tatami Galaxy operates with the air of a work that demands to be perceived as intelligent—relentlessly clever, dizzyingly fast, and brimming with existential rhetoric that, at first glance, seems profound. Yet, upon closer scrutiny, one must ask: does it truly wrestle with the weight of its ideas, or does it merely perform intelligence, spinning in circles rather than daring to break free?

Beneath the spectacle of recursion and regret lies a safe, almost glib answer to the very questions it raises. It presents the illusion of depth without the sacrifice required to attain it, resolving itself into a neatly packaged moral realization rather than the abyssal confrontation its premise promises. It flirts with the terror of infinite choice, only to retreat into a conclusion that soothes rather than unsettles. Unlike works that truly dissect existential paralysis—where revelation is not a comfort but a wound—The Tatami Galaxy prefers to reassure its audience rather than leave them irreversibly altered.

Thank you for reading. Thus stands my analysis—uncompromising, unembellished, and spoken with the full honesty of my heart.